The ISJAI 2005 Proceedings

INTRODUCTION

THE COMMITTEES

WELCOMING SPEECH
Rector of University of Indonesia
Dean of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of Indonesia
Head of the Department of Anthropology FISIP University of Indonesia
Editor in-Chief of the Journal Antropologi Indonesia

INSTITUTION PARTICIPATION

SYMPOSIUM RESUME

PLENARY SESSIONS
The Relevance of Anthropology to Indonesia
Prof. Dr. Amri Marzali (Anthropology University of Indonesia)

Democracy, Politics and the Contribution of Anthropology
Dr. Hans Antlov (The Ford Foundation)

COSMOPATRIOTS: GLOBALIZATION, PATRIOTISM, COSMOPOLITANISM IN INDONESIA AND COMPARATIVE ASIAN PERSPECTIVE
Panel Coordinators: Edwin Jurriëns (University of New South Wales at ADFA) & Jeroen de Kloet (ASCoR University of Amsterdam)

It seems no longer feasible to oppose the patriotic with the cosmopolitan; under the current forces of globalization, both are profoundly intertwined. The Cosmopatriots panel aims to unravel the complex theoretical triangle consisting of globalization (interpreted as the flows of capital, people, media, technologies and ideologies (Appadurai, 1996), patriotism (interpreted as love for the country—pointing at the emotional attachments towards the country) and cosmopolitanism (interpreted as respect for and interest in other cultures). Both patriotism and cosmopolitanism can be considered sentiments, more than ideologies (Appiah, 2001). We position “Indonesian” and other “Asian” cultural expressions—popular and elite—at the center of the global-cosmo-patrio triangle.

Rather than presenting a univocal ideological reading in which cosmo-patriotism is either celebrated or denounced, we aim to tease out the contradictions, anxieties as well as hopes represented in the cultural forms and communities under study. The tensions that come with cosmo-patriotism is expressed in different cultural domains, ranging from the ironic, (post-)modern and highly localized art works of Indonesian artist Heri Dono to the cosmopolitan sound of Hip Hop, transformed by the Hong Kong collective LazyMuthaFucka into a patriotic sound in which Chineseness is celebrated.

We deliberately integrate studies on popular culture with those of the arts. We do not wish to debunk the disciplinary and aesthetic distinction between both, yet we do refuse prioritizing or hierarchizing both domains. The expressions under study are also not necessarily based in Indonesia or Asia, they include diasporic “Asian” cultural communities that articulate a strong sense of transnational patriotic belonging.

001. Peran Negara dalam Mengurus Kebudayaan
Cecep Rukendi (Research & Development, Cultural and Tourism Department Republic of Indonesia)
002. Indonesian Radio and the Renewal of Citizenship
Edwin Jurriens (School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of New South Wales at ADFA)
003. Sumatrans Inventing Indonesia: ‘Java’, Mass Media and Colonial Scholarship in the Late Colonial Period
Paul Tickell (School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of New South Wales at ADFA)
004. From the Exotic and the Assimilated into the Hybrid: Questioning Representations of Asian Women in Australian Popular Media
Monika S. Sw. Doxey (School of Humanities Faculty of Arts Australian National University)
005. Independence Days: Gay Indonesians and National Belonging
Tom Boellstorff (Department of Anthropology University of California [Irvine])
006. Globalized TV Programmes and National Response in Indonesia
Makoto Koike (St. Andrew’s University)
007. Musical Worlds in Jogjakarta: Contexts, Genres, Identities
Martin Richter (School of Social Sciences La Trobe University)
008. The Circulation and Consumption of Indonesian Music in Asia; Cultural Meanings and Socio-Political Functions of Minangkabau Pop Music Reception in Malaysia
Suryadi (School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies [CNWS] Leiden University)
009. Scare Ourselves to Death: Reality Television on Ghost in Indonesian Television
Tito Imanda (New York University)

INNOVATION AND MANIPULATION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES IN INDONESIA IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION
Panel Coordinator: Shinji Yamashita (Department of Cultural Anthropology University of Tokyo)

Culture should be understood as undergoing a dynamic process of being shaped and reshaped in history, rather than having an unchangeable essence. In this process, there are two fundamental principles that regulate cultural production today: the state and the market. In modern nation-states, different forms of local and regional culture have become resources that can contribute to the formation of a national culture. At the same time, with the penetration of capitalism into the remotest corners of the world, culture has also become a commodity that is bought and sold in a global market. In this panel, culture will be taken as a set of resources that can be consciously reworked and manipulated for social, economic and political purposes between the nation-state and the global market. We therefore examine the dynamics of the use of cultural, natural and human resources in Indonesia in the age of globalization in relation to regional governance, popular culture, ecological system, and transnational migration. In so doing, the panel also attempts to build up a new theory of culture which fits the conditions of the world today. The panel consists of two sessions with six presenters and two discussants.

010. The Cultural Anthropology of Resources: Indonesian Examples in the Transnational Age
Shinji Yamashita (Department of Cultural Anthropology University of Tokyo)
011. Regional Autonomy and Cultural Resources: A Balinese Case
Haruya Kagami (Kanazawa University)
012. Emerging Lords in East Sumba: Exploration and Preservation of Cultural Norms in the Influence of Globalization, A Case Study in Prabakul
Indah Setyawati (Asian Development Bank), Stepanus Makambombu (GTZ), David A. and N. Fina (GMIT)
013. Forest as a Cultural Resource to Function as a School of Democracy: Challenges for Collaborative Forest Governance in West Kutai District of East Kalimantan
Makoto Inoue (University of Tokyo)
014. A Contested Cultural Identity among in Three Sumatran Cities of Indonesia: Ethnic Entrepreneurs between Global Economy and Ethnic Identity
Nursyirwan Effendi (Anthropology Andalas University)
015. Knowledge and Image across the Boundary: Javanese-Malay in Niche
Koji Miyazaki (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies)
016. Network as a Social Resource: The Case of Bugis Migrants in Sumatra and Sabah
Makoto Itoh (Tokyo Metropolitan University)
017. Beyond the State’s Control: Transnational Migration of Florenese and in Nunukan-Tawao Borderland
Riwanto Tirtosudarmo (LIPI)

CROSS-BORDER MOVEMENTS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA, IDENTITY POLITICS AND CITIZENSHIPS
Panel Coordinators: Riwanto Tirtosudarmo and Johanis Haba (LIPI)

Southeast Asian region besides its renowned as a place where all the western colonial empires have their footprints is strongly characterized by its remarkable inter-regional population movements. The decolonizing processes however have changed significantly the repertoire of the movements as nation-state border have been created. The changing configuration of the political space resulted, among other things, in the increasing barriers for the movements of the population through immigration checkpoints in the border areas that many ethnic and communal groups are commonly share a trans-border living space. Since the 1970s the unevenness in economic achievements between countries has been strongly instigated cross-border movements in the region for economic reasons. In the 1980s and 1990s, as political tensions and violent conflicts occurred in countries, such as Burma, Cambodia, Vietnam and Indonesia, further complicate the futility to control the state’s boundaries from cross-border movements. Lately, as the United States and its western allies engage in the global campaign against terrorism, Southeast Asian region becoming one of the strategic-political vocal points and movement of people have perceived as one of the security threats. It is therefore timely for social scientists working on Southeast Asian region to look into the complexity of cross-border movements that is increasingly characterized by irregular and forced migration. This panel is an attempt to bring together scholars who are doing research on the border areas in which cross-border migration is perceived as closely related with the emergence of identity politics and its related issues of citizenships. It is expected that the panel will covers border areas of Burma-Thailand-Cambodia, Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippine as well as Indonesia-PNG-East Timor-Australia.

018. Community Development of People in the Border Areas Between Indonesia and Democratic Republic of Timor Leste
Johanis Haba (Research Center for Society and Culture, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta)
019. Pelintas Batas Tradisional RI-RDTL: Sebuah Perspektif Sosio-Antropologi
Yanuarius Koli Bau (Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang)
020. Indigenous Peoples in the Border Areas of Indonesia
Herry Yogaswara (P2K-LIPI, Jakarta)
021. Patterns of Cross-Border Relations Between West Kalimantan and Sarawak
Fariastuti (Faculty of Economics Tanjungpura University)
022. Cross-Border Movements and Rural/Urban Migration: A Moral Geography of the Kelabit Community
Matthew Amster (Department of Sociology and Anthropology Gettysburg College USA)
023. The Construction and Deconstruction of Migrant Identities in Contemporary Malaysia: Case Study of Indonesian Bugis Migrants in Sabah and Indonesian Kenyah Migrants in Sarawak
Syamsul Hadi, Dave Lumenta, Iwan Meulia Pirous, Rhino Ariefiansyah, Rio S. Jaslim, and Sayed Fauzan R. (CIRES FISIP UI)
024. Religion and Political Conflict in Southern Thailand-Northern Malaysia
Alexander Hortsmann (Muenster University Germany)
025. The Social and Economic Impacts on Development in the Cross-Border Areas between Thailand and Burma
I Ketut Ardhana (PSDR-LIPI Jakarta)
026. Living in the Border Areas of Thailand: Ethnic Minorities and Their Identities
Yekti Maunati (PSDR-LIPI Jakarta)
027. Dynamics of Maritime Connection in Sulu-Sabah-Indonesia Region
Ikuya Tokoro (ILCAA-TUFS Japan)
028. Cross-Border Movements and Regional Security in Southeast Asia
Viacheslav F. Urlyapov (Institute of Oriental Studies Moscow)

(RE-) CONSTRUCTING COLLECTIVE IDENTITIES AND RELIGIOUS IMAGINATIONS IN DEMOCRATIZING INDONESIA
Panel Coordinators: Ken Miichi (CSEAS Kyoto University) and Yasuyuki Nagafuchi (Nagoya Institute of Technology)

There are various regional conflicts in the name of religions and other identities in Indonesia after 1998. Intensifying identity politics is one of the results of democratization after the end of the Suharto’s authoritarian rule. Among various collective identities, religion may be the most problematic. We should notice that religious identity itself is often constructed by other identities and interests. We would like to explore how people construct and reconstruct collective identities for political mobilizations. Through examines of conflicting cases, we can search for fundamental characteristics of transforming Indonesian society and politics.

029. Arsitektur sebagai Identitas Komunitas: Kajian Identitas Hindu di Perkampungan Orang Jawa
I Komang G. Santhyasa (Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang)
030. “Orang Betawi”: Construction and Transformation of a Creole Notion of Jakartan Identity
Jacqueline Knörr (Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology)
031. Pergulatan Agama-Agama di Tengger (Studi Etnografi terhadap Upacara Karo di Kawasan Tengger Probolinggo)
Paring Waluyo Utomo (Pusat Studi dan Pengembangan Kebudayaan AVERROES)
032. Form Vihara to Klenteng, and to National Hero’s monument?
Tsuda Koji (Department of Cultural Anthropology University of Tokyo)
034. Agama, Identitas dan Integrasi Sosial:Peran Gudang Garam dan Lirboyo Sebagai Elit Strategis di Kediri
Suhadi (Pusat Studi Agama dan Lintas Budaya Program Paskasarjana UGM)
035. Preserving Diversity, Strengthening Unity: Contesting Religious Identity in the Democratization Process in Indonesia
Amich Alhumami (The National Development Planning Agency/BAPPENAS)
036. Reconstructing Collective Identity: The Case of Pakpak in Dairi Regency, North Sumatera, Indonesia
Budi Agustono (University of North Sumatera)
037. External Sources of Radical Islam Identity in Indonesia
Abubakar Eby Hara (Jember University)
038. Tapal Kuda Bergolak: Suatu Kajian Tentang Resistensi Terhadap Pelengseran Presiden Gus Dur 2001
Abd. Latif Bustami (Universitas Negeri Malang)
039. May 1998 Riot’s in Indonesia Dailies (Chinese Vs Moslem Or Power Vs Power)
Nina Widyawati (Indonesia Institute of Science/LIPI)
040. Politik Reaksioner Islam Sumatera Barat Pasca Orde Baru
Yopi Fetrian (FISIP Andalas University)
041. Indonesian Moslem and Christian Relationship: S-P-R (Social-Political, and Religiosity) Study in Jabodetabek and Mamibi
Benny Ferdy Malonda (Anthropology Sam Ratulangi University)
042. Dialectics Between Cultural Stereotype and Everyday Social Interaction in Post Conflict Area: A Case Study in Central Kalimantan
Ivanovich Agusta (IPB Bogor)
043. Conflicts and Peace Initiatives in Indonesia: Mapping and Assessment
Badrus Sholeh (UIN Syarif Hidayatullah)
044. Keseragaman dalam Keragaman: Kehidupan Multi Etnik di Kota Padang
Iim Imadudin (Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional Padang)
045.Forum Umat Beriman (FUB): Sebuah Model Penanggulangan Terorisme Lewat Persaudaraan Lintas Agama
Nugroho Trisnu Brata (Pusat Studi Kebudayaan Universitas Gadjah Mada)

INDONESIAN ISLAM IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT: A POLYPHONY OF VOICES
Panel Coordinators: James J. Fox (RSPAS ANU) and Makruf Jamhari (Centre for the Study of Islam and Society in Indonesia)

Islam in Indonesia today offers a ‘polyphony’ of voices reflecting different views, different orientations and different networks. An ethnographic perspective is needed to appreciate the context of these different voices, their relationship to one another and their connections to a global Islamic community. This session will endeavour to bring together a variety of students and scholars of contemporary Islam in the examination of its unity and diversity.

046. Salafism and Democracy: A Study on Salafi Muslim Groups In Indonesia
Muh. Adlin Sila (Department of Religion RI)
047. Himrohnir Manrohi Lahmibis: Sebuah Kajian tentang Keyakinan Keagamaan Wong Tengger Islam
Abd. Latif Bustami (Universitas Negeri Malang)
048. Islam, Ritual and Settlement Pattern: A Case Study of Puyung Village, Central Lombok, Indonesia
Ibnu Sasongko (National Institute of Technology Malang)
049. Indonesian Islam through the Eyes of the Other: The Eyes of Bosnian Islam
Mersija Maglajlic (Australian National University)
050. “New Sufi”: Kebangkitan “Islam tradisi” di Minangkabau
Iim Imadudin (Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional Padang)
051. Sharing the Space: Traditional Pesantren Facing New Worlds
Suparto (Faculty of Dakwah and Communication Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta)
052. Pemetaan Peran Pesantren dalam Membangun Jaringan Komunitas dan Mengembangkan Perdamaian di Indonesia
Badrus Sholeh (UIN Syarif Hidayatullah & LP3ES Jakarta)
053. Pesona “Jama’ah Tabligh” dalam ber-“Khuruj”
Nugroho Trisnu Brata (Pusat Studi Kebudayaan Universitas Gadjah Mada)
054. ‘Neo-Modernism’ in a ‘Modern’ Islamic Organization, Muhammadiyah
Kim Hyung-Jun (Department of Cultural Anthropology Kangwon National University)

AUTONOMY AND TRADITION: CONTEMPORARY TRANSITIONS IN EASTERN INDONESIA
Panel Coordinators: James J. Fox and G. Tom Therik (RSPAS The Australian National University)

The new era of autonomy in Indonesia presents both opportunities and challenges. Nowhere is this more apparent than in eastern Indonesia with its considerable social and linguistic diversity. This session will gather a group of researchers whose recent fieldwork offers glimpses of the transformation of traditions at the local level in different parts of the region and relate these transformations to those in other parts of Indonesia and in the region.

055. Sabalong Samalewa: Sebuah Kajian tentang Keyakinan Masyarakat Sekitar Hutan di Era Otonomi Daerah
Abd. Latif Bustami (Universitas Negeri Malang)
056. Asset Based Community Development in Indonesia: Case Studies from Buton and Bajawa
Andrew McWilliam and Kathryn Robinson (Australian National University)
057. Membangun Identitas Etnis (Orang Timor): Integrasi atau Separasi?
Yanuarius Koli Bau (Universitas Nusa Cendana)
058. Great Expectations and the Sobering Reality of Autonomy: The Island of Savu in the Early Years of Decentralizaton
Genevieve Duggan (National University of Singapore)
059. Otonomi Daerah, Suatu Kemajuan atau Kemunduran? Studi Kasus Kecamatan Haharu, Kabupaten Dati II Sumba Timur, Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur
Eninofa W. Rambe (Wahana Visi Indonesia)
060. Konflik dan Integrasi Sosial Eks Pengungsi Timor Timur dan Penduduk Lokal di Timor Barat
Yanuarius Koli Bau (Universitas Nusa Cendana)
061. Discourse on Special Autonomy in Papua: The Transition in Traditional Views of Politics and Democracy
Frenky Simanjuntak (Centre for East Indonesian Affairs)
062. How Bad Indonesian becomes Good Kupang Malay: Articulating Regional Autonomy in West Timor
Barbara Dix Grimes (Arafura Consulting and Training Services Darwin)
063. The Near Becomes Far and the Far Becomes Near: Tourism and Changing Socio-scapes in Labuan Bajo, Western Flores
Maribeth Erb (National University of Singapore)
064. Harvest Festivals for Haircutting: the Rise of the ‘Religious’ Traders
Blair Palmer (Australian National University)
065.Tradition in the Modern State: Narrative of Origin in the Contemporary Political and Economic Contestations of the Kei Islanders, Eastern Indonesia
Dedi Supriadi Adhuri (Research Centre for Society and Culture Indonesian Institute of Sciences/LIPI)
066. “Once We Searched, Now We Steal”: Shifts in Strategy and Technique among Traditional Fishers on the Island of Rote
G. Tom Therik (Australian National University)

IMAGE AND FACTS OF INDUSTRIAL RELATION IN THE ERA OF REFORMATION AND GLOBALIZATION IN INDONESIA
Panel Coordinator: Kosuke Mizuno (CSEAS Kyoto University)

Industrial relation in Indonesia has experienced important changes since Soeharto’s step down from presidency, and new directions are emerging. Reformation of the law system that guarantee the freedom of unite and negotiate for labor has enabled the emergence of so many new trade unions, and should end the exclusive corporatism which had dominated New Order’s Indonesia under the name of Pancasila Industrial Relation. Important idea along with globalization is ‘flexible employment’ which makes the company dismisses the labor easily and employing the out-sourcing system. ‘Rule of law’ which characterizes the new industrial relation court is also the direction along with globalization. Some people emphasize the process of bilateral negotiation as Musyawarah Mufakat that emerged during Soekarno era. Remnants of Pancasila Industrial Relation still exist. Under these directions, plus old concepts, and old minded company and bureaucracy, what is the reality of Indonesian industrial relation? And what is real direction of Indonesian industrial relation? And how can we improve the industrial relation so that welfare of labor can be improved?

067. Pancasila Industrial Relations No More? Ideological Influences on Indonesian Industrial Relations in the Post-Suharto Period
Michael Ford (School of Political and International Studies Flinders University)
068. Labor Protest in Indonesia: Opportunities and Problems
Hari Nugroho (Department of Sociology University of Indonesia)
069. Challenges of Labour Organization in Today’s Indonesian Industrial Relations
Indrasari Tjandraningsih (AKATIGA)
070. The Rise of Working-Class Leadership in Indonesia: The Case 0f Maspion Unit I in Sidoarjo, East Java
Je Seong Jeon (Korean Institute of Southeast Asian Studies)
071. A Path to Stable Industrial Relations in Indonesia: Industrial Conflict Resolutions under Weak Law Enforcement
Kosuke Mizuno (CSEAS Kyoto University)
072. Peran SP/SB dalam Menghadapi PHK di Industri Hasil Hutan Studi terhadap 3 SP/SB Tingkat Nasioanl Sektor Kehutanan dan Perkayuan di Indonesia
Rina Herawati (Researcher on Labor Issues in Indonesia)
073. Does the Law really Matter ?: Labor and the Law in “Labour Law Reform” Perspective
Jafar Suryomenggolo (CSEAS Kyoto University)
074. The Role of Indonesian National Polices in Maintaining Order during Industrial Disputes
Muhammad Mustofa (Department of Criminology University of Indonesia)
075. Dialectics on Strengthening and Weakening Dual Economy in Indonesia
Ani Tetiani (Free Researcher)

CITIZENSHIP, COMMUNITY AND GENDERED IDENTITIES IN INDONESIA: COMPETING SUBJECTIVITIES AND AGENDAS
Panel Coordinator: Ratna Saptari (International Institute of Social History)

As the boundaries and authority of the Indonesian nation-state are strongly being questioned and contested we are becoming increasingly aware of the need to understand how different groups are claiming their rights as citizens of particular communities and nations. In anthropology, the study of communities and tradition in the past has usually referred to homogeneous and clearly bounded entities. Tradition was seen as a long established and generally accepted custom and contestations to traditions was conducted through clearly set rules and obligations. These social customs have been considered to accommodate diversity throughout the years.

For more than two decades, these understandings have been heavily challenged, as not only rapid changes and transformations are taking place but also as disciplinary boundaries are being dismantled. For Indonesia such realizations have been sharply brought to attention in the post-‘new order’ period. There is now an increasing awareness that boundaries of community and custom are constantly being redefined. With this understanding it is important to examine alternative and competing manifestations of community identity, and how they are based on preconceived notions of gender, class and ethnicity, as these can provide insights into the dynamics of a ‘nation’.

Working within the concept of nation-state, citizenship also becomes an important manifestation of the social positioning of different groups. As community members are part of a nation-state but at the same time are rooted in their own communities, the malleability of individual and collective identities have made one’s sense of citizenship a highly complex affair. Therefore citizenship can be understood not only as a legal position but also a discursive one. It provides the formal categories for claims-making, sometimes in the name of national belonging or on behalf of the individual’s or collective notion of political and economic rights. Since citizenship is also a means to signify particular relationships, social positioning and institutional practices, it is also highly loaded with cultural assumptions and a sense of belonging. Those who are excluded from some or all citizenship rights on the basis of gender, race or ethnicity frequently may take up the rhetoric of citizenship to make claims upon nation, state or local communities.

In this panel we would like to solicit papers focusing on the dynamics of claim-making and contestations of citizenship and community made by different groups and parties in different arenas particularly how these are based on gender, class and ethnicity. This would include examining the workings of state institutions or contending elements within the civil society and how this can result in processes of inclusion and exclusion. The struggles to claim certain rights can focus on the rights to employment, on land, natural resources or legal rights as citizens. Papers should also address the symbolic and cultural underpinnings of these processes of claim-making where different groups may take up the rhetoric of gender, race or ethnicity through reference to tradition, myths and custom.

076. Between Womanhood and the Nation: Paradigms of Women Activism in Twentieth Century Indonesia
Ayu Ratih (Jaringan Kerja Budaya)
077. Identity Politics and the Discourse of Women’s Political Representation in Indonesia
Sri Lestari Wahyuningrum (University of Indonesia)
078. Awarding Polygamy: Masculinity and Citizenship in Contemporary Indonesian Mediascape
Sonja van Wichelen (University of Amsterdam)
079. Locating the Discourse on Gender Identity in Indonesia: An Exploration of the Scholarly Literature
Sita van Bemmelen (Denpasar) and Mies Grijns (Leiden)
080. Representasi Perempuan dalam Kebijakan Publik Dalam Era Otonomi Daerah: Studi Kasus di Sepuluh Daerah di Indonesia
Lisabona Rahman (Women’s Research Institute)
081. Commemoration and Claim making: The Uses and Abuses of Representing the Chinese Indonesian Women Mass Rapes
Monika S.W. Doxey (Australian National University)
082. Styling the Revolution: Masculinities, Youth and Street Politics
Doreen Lee (Cornell University)
083. Mengembangkan Api Kartini: Kegiatan Pendidikan Gerwani untuk Kaum Perempuan dan Anak-anak
Theodora J. Erlijna (Institut Sejarah Sosial Indonesia)
084. Pengetahuan, Identitas dan Pemberdayaan Politik Perempuan dalam Komuniti
Eka Chandra (Akatiga)
085. Perempuan Tani dan Konflik Kepentingan dalam Relasi Agraria
Sofwan Samandawai (Akatiga)
086. Gerakan Demokratisasi Lokal Melalui Peran Forum Warga
Juni Thamrin (IPGI)
087. Dinamika Perjuangan Agraria Masa Reformasi: Tiga Kasus Konflik Petani versus Perkebunan di Jawa Tengah
Sri Rahma Mary Herwati
088. Ketiadaan dalam Keberadaan: Beban Berlebih Perempuan Petani di Dua Desa dalam Kawasan Ekosistim Halimun
Ulfa Hidayati (RMI – the Indonesian Institute for Forest and Environment)
089. Relasi Kuasa di Atas Tanah Baru: Peran yang Diabaikan
Siti Fikriyah Khuriyati (Lembaga Lapera)
090. Di Balik Panggung Reforma Agraria: Perjuangan Tersembunyi Kaum Tani Perempuan
Pinky Chrysantini (Akatiga)
091. Rebuilding Women’s Identity Within Rural Empowerment Projects
Ivanovich Augusta (IPB)
092. Indonesian Citizenship, Chinese Community and Politics of Contestations
Thung Ju Lan (LIPI)
093. Business, Belief and Ethnicity: Chinese entrepreneurs and the charismatic movement in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Juliette Koning (Free University Amsterdam)
094. Perempuan Tionghoa dalam Perubahan Zaman: Antara Kalimantan dan Jawa
Khanis Suvianita (Gaya Nusantara)
095. Syari’ah dan Perempuan: Kasus Desa Ngruki, Jawa Tengah
Ciciek Farha (Rahima Jakarta)
096. Transnational Islam: The Role of Religion in Indonesian Migrants’ Citizenship Struggles
Rachel Silvey (University of Colorado at Boulder)
097. Transnationalism and (Im)mobility: The Gendered Processes of Boundary Construction in the Riau Islands
Lenore Lyons (University of Wollongong) and Michele Ford (Flinders University)
098. Social Mobility of Female Labour Within Dual Labour Market and Rural Community
Ani Tetiani (Bogor)
099. Pemberdayaan PUK: Upaya di Dua Lintasan Gerakan
Makinuddin (Akatiga)
100. Peran Perempuan dalam Sistim Pangan Lokal
Tri Hadiyanto (Akatiga)
101. Pembenahan Tata Produksi Pertanian Pangan: Strategi dan Praktek Menuju Kedaulatan Petani
Yusup Napiri (Akatiga)
102. Contestation, Culture and Traditions in the Reconstruction of Riau Identity
Lugina Setyawati (Monash University)
103. Perempuan dalam Desa,Antara Ada dan Tiada: Pengalaman Belajar Mendemokratisasikan Desentralisasi di Sanggau, Garut dan Toraja
Paramita Iswari (KARSA Yogyakarta)

LEGAL PLURALISM IN THE CHANGING GLOBAL CONTEXT AND HOW IT IS DEFINED FOR INDONESIA
Panel Coordinator: Sulistyowati Irianto (Faculty of Law University of Indonesia)

Legal pluralism is no longer studied in setting where state law, local law (religious law, adat law) could be identified as entity with obviously clear boundaries. There has been a new invasion of law across the border. By way of international co-operation, mainly interchanging ideas of human rights and women’s rights, trade and financing, transnational of dispute settlements; therefore international law enter into the national arena and has effected to the local law. The purpose of this panel is to examine how the interrelated and interchanging of international, national, and local law could be seen in many field of studies in Indonesian context. The Constellation of legal pluralism could be found in :
a. policies and regulations of resource management (including water, forestry and fisheries)
b. policies and regulation regarding regional autonomy in many aspects
c. policies and regulation regarding agrarian’s issues
d. issues on revitalization of adat in many aspects
e. gender perspective in development’s issues

104. Indonesian Chinese Women under the Shadow of Private Law: A Case Study of a Chinese Peranakan Community in X, West Java, Indonesia
Lidwina Inge Nurtjahyo (University of Indonesia Law School)
105. The Localization of Global Order in the Natural Resources Management Study on Aanslibbing Management in Sitiung West Sumatra
Ade Saptomo (Faculty of Law Andalas University)
106. Status Hak Atas Ruang di Atas dan di Bawah Air Antara Kawasan Budidaya dan Alamiah Serta Potensi Konflik (Studi di Pulau Kapas DKI dan Semangka Kalimantan Timur)
Imam Koeswahyono (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Malang)
107. Hak Asasi Perempuan dalam Perspektif Pluralisme Hukum Baru
Sulistyowati Irianto (University of Indonesia)
108. The Restitution of Communal Land: Agenda for Natural Resources Self Regulation of the Indigenous People of Kampung Dukuh
Meidia Pratama (Yayasan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Aktivitas Sosial/YP2AS)
109. Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Perdagangan Lintas Batas Jalur Laut di Kepulauan Riau (Kepri)
A. Josias Simon (Criminology FISIP Universitas Indonesia)
110. Obstructing and Stimulating Factors in Religious Group’s Harmony (from Domination, Alienation, towards Accommodation, Assimilation and Amalgamation)
Bungaran Antonius Simanjuntak and Netty Hutabarat (Universitas Negeri Medan)

REGIONAL BUSINESS COOPERATION: IMTGT, SIJORI AND MAMINSA IN CULTURAL CONTEXT
Panel Coordinator: Usman Pelly (Medan State University )

At the beginning of 1994 the Indonesian government began to develop regional business cooperation among the provinces which are geographically relatively close to their foreign neighbourhood, such as IMTGT (Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangles) which consisted of north province of Sumatra with north provinces of Malaysia and south provinces of Thailand, SIJORI (Singapore-Johor-Riau) and later on included also West Kalimantan, and MAMINSA (Manado North Sulawesi-Mindanao the Philippines-Sabah Malaysia) and later join to cooperate with Brunei Darussalam.

The regional business cooperation program includes: industry, fishery, hotel-tourism, agriculture, men-power and finances. There is also an exchange program of agro-business expertises among the region of IMTGT which involved their universities. The regional business cooperation conceptually has challenge the centralized tradition among the nations especially Indonesia. The implication of the cooperation in Indonesia was always full of “tension” between region and central government (Jakarta), and consequently the program could not be implemented timely and properly. Indeed many of them failed to be realized. Nowadays, the regional cooperation still works, but very slowly, especially after the monetary crises occurred at these regions.

This panel session would examine (1) the problem of power relation and distribution between each central government and the regions in the context of business cooperation, (2) the unwillingness or less-trust of the central government to transfer their political power to the region which cooperated with the foreign countries directly, (3) the centralized bureaucratic problems had put the business cooperation implementation in Indonesia under scheduled and yet many of them failed to be implemented. How far could the problems be solved politically and culturally in the context of regional autonomy issues and globalization for the future? It also would be discussed further.

111. The Equal Partners with Un-Equal Actors
Destanul Aulia & Sri Fajar Ayu (UKM-Malaysia)
112. Etnisitas dan Pengembangan Jaringan Bisnis
Ibnu Hajar (Universitas Negeri Medan)
113. Batang Terendam yang Sulit Dibangkitkan Dunia Melayu dalam Konteks Kerjasama Bisnis Segitiga Indonesia–Malaysia–Thailand
Ichwan Azhari (Program Studi Antropologi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan)
114. A Representation of Three Trouble Regions among the Neighbor Nations
Usman Pelly (Universitas Negeri Medan/Unimed)

VIGILANTISM IN INDONESIA: IT IS JUST AN EXCESS OF REFORMATION ERA?
Panel Coordinator: Adrianus Meliala (Department of Criminology Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of Indonesia)

Vigilantism as the tendency having some members of the public to exercise violence to other individuals suspected of committing crime having been practiced in some areas, especially the big cities. During the reform period, it is widely perceived the number as well as the modes of vigilantism has been multiplied. It is argued and discussed how far this relates to the excess exacerbated by dynamics of the reform period. Or, could that possibly originated from the basic values of Indonesian society?

This panel invites papers that argue such notion which is in line with that ‘just blames the reform’ theory or be critical to that using some other approaches. Papers containing case study from other parts of the world would be highly appreciated as that would enrich the debate on how to understand vigilantism.

115. Vigilante Violence in Post-Authoritarian States: The Case of Indonesia and Russia
Ian Douglas Wilson (Asia Research Centre Murdoch University)
116. Preman, Civil Society and the State: Competing or Compatible?
Adrianus Meliala (Dept. of Criminology FISIP University of Indonesia)
117. Kekerasan [Para Jagoan] dan Dendam di Bali (Beberapa Catatan Lapangan)
Ngurah Suryawan (Udayana University)
118. Mobs in Indonesia
Bridget Welsh (Southeast Asia Studies [SAIS] John Hopkins University)

GENDER, SEXUALITY AND POWER IN AN ALREADY GLOBALISED INDONESIA
Panel Coordinators: Nurul Ilmi Idrus (Anthropology Hasanuddin University) and Irwan M. Hidayana (Anthropology University of Indonesia)

Are gender and sexuality still a controversial issue? How differ are they articulated in different cultures? Jolly and Manderson (1997) argue that neither the study of sexuality nor the study of gender has allowed us to come down on the side of either biological essentialism or cultural construction. In relation to this argument, Errington (1990:11) formulates this dualism into ‘biology’ and ‘culture’ and argues for the relationship between the two rather than taking one side or the other by stating that ‘the most basic and obvious importance of embodiment for culture and vice versa is that we are born biologically unfinished and require human culture in order to develop into humans.’ In applying this understanding to gendered social practices, Errington writes ‘bodies and cultures interact and form each other, and interpretation of the nature and functions and capacities of the body differ in different cultures’ (p.14).

This panel will focus on how gender and sexuality intertwine with economic, political, social and cultural forces which must account for power relations, relations of domination, in Indonesian communities; and how notion of gender and sexuality is articulated in building up cooperation and partnership in Indonesian society.

Papers—on how the notion of gender and sexuality is articulated in the local culture, how this notion is influenced by global processes, how the masculine and the feminine in relation to sexuality are culturally constructed (including non-normative sexualities), and how tradition and ethnic identity contribute to gender differences, and accordingly how men and women are treated differently in different culture—are the topics that are mostly welcome. But, papers on related broader topic are also appreciated.

119. Membongkar Mitos Perempuan Minangkabau
Jumhari (Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional Padang)
120. The Role and Position of the Javanese Women in Suriname
Kadi Kartokromo (Suriname)
121. Sexuality, Ethnicity and Politics: A Viewpoint and Experience from Malaysia
Shamsul AB and M. Fauzi BS (University Kebangsaan Malaysia)
122. Zina and Enigma of Sex Education for Muslim Youth in Indonesia
Linda R. Bennett (La Trobe University Australia)
123. To Cover the Aurat: Veiling and Sexual Morality among the Muslim Minangkabau
Lyn Parker (University of Western Australia)
124. The Struggle over Women: Gender and Sexuality in Two Indonesian Islamic Organization
Rachel Rinaldo (University of Chicago)
125. Hunter and Lines: Gender, Sex and Sexuality among Same-Sex Relations in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Nurul Ilmi Idrus (Hasanuddin University)
126. Homosexuality and National Personality in Reformasi Era
Tom Boellstorff (University of California Irvine)
127. Embodied Gender: Exploring Issues of Gender and Sexuality in Sulawesi
Sharyn Graham (Auckland University of Technology)
128. Indonesia’s Fight Club: Men, Masculinity and Cultural Trauma in the Internet
Marshal Clark (University of Tasmania)
129. The Sinetron and the Contemporary Femininity Construction in Indonesia
Widjajanti M. Santoso (Research Centre of Social and Cultural Studies/PMB-LIPI)
130. Female Sexuality in Indonesian Girls’ Magazines
Suzie Handajani (University of Western Australia)
131. Politik Seksual dalam Film Animasi Disney Mulan
Endah Triastuti (Jakarta)
132. Journey of Adolescent Sexual Curiosity as a Signal of Needs on Sexuality Education in Makassar
Sartiah Yusran (University of Melbourne)
133. Peran dan Posisi Perempuan Minangkabau dalam Kelembagaan di Nagari
Syahrizal (Department of Anthropology, Universitas Andalas)

LOCAL HANDICRAFTS AND THEIR NATIONAL AND TRANSNATIONAL CONSUMPTION: INDONESIA, JAPAN AND ASIAN COUNTRIES
Panel Coordinators: Teruo Sekimoto (Institute of Oriental Culture University of Tokyo) and Semiarto Aji Purwanto (Anthropology University of Indonesia)

Handicrafts combine opposite images. On the one hand, they provoke the image of local craftspeople toiling on manual labor. Their skills and the patterns of work are deeply embedded in traditions and social relationships of local communities. On the other hand, they conjure up the image of privacy and comfort of urban middle-class lives, for today’s handicrafts as commodities are closely tied to consumerism that is cosmopolitan and transnational in its character. The aim of this panel is to explore existing relationships between local craft traditions, on the one hand, and global consumerism in large urban centers both in Indonesia and other countries, on the other. Are local craftspeople and entrepreneurs overwhelmed by the global trends of market economy and consumerism, or do the latter rather enhance local identities of handicrafts? Is it possible to find cooperation and partnership between the local and the global, or just exploitation and domination? We assume that the simple oppositional views about the local and the global could not capture what is going on at their interface. We would like to invite paper proposals which combine the local contexts of handicrafts production with the cosmopolitan and global contexts of their consumption. The search into the production and consumption of handicrafts can also include aspects of gender relations, local developments of identities and economies, and a lot more.

134. Kerajinan dan Pengrajin Narapidana: Sebuah Kajian tentang Kreativitas, Komoditi, dan Kompetisi di Era Kapitalisme Mondial
Abd. Latif Bustami (Universitas Negeri Malang)
135. Globalizing Crafts and Localizing Globalization: Handicraft Production in Tampaksiring, Bali
Jessica Champagne (Insist)
136. Material Ties: The Museum as Contact Zone
Fiona Kerlogue (Anthropology Department Horniman Museum London)
137. Local handicrafts, National Dress, and Global Fashion: Production and Consumption of Indonesian Hand-woven Textiles
Ayami Nakatani (Okayama University)
138. Interface between Local Batik Production and its Transnational Demand: The Case of Batik in Cirebon
Teruo Sekimoto (Institute of Oriental Culture University of Tokyo)
139. Cloth at Home: Consumption of Indonesian Textiles Viewed from Shige Oomura Collection (National Museum of Ethnology Japan)
Rie Taguchi (Research Institute for Humanity and Nature/RIHN)
140. Dari Desa ke Dunia: Dilema Pengrajin Batik di Trusmi, Jawa Barat dalam Memasarkan Produk
Semiarto Aji Purwanto & Cut Vianne (Universitas Indonesia)
141. To Survive Without Money: Resiprositas sebagai Pemenuhan Kewajiban Sosial di Desa Trusmi, Cirebon
Cut Vianne (Universitas Indonesia)

EMERGENCE OF NEW LOCAL POLITICS IN THE DECENTRALIZATION ERA
Panel Coordinators: Okamoto Masaaki (CSEAS Kyoto University) and Jun Honna (Ritsumeikan University)

The collapse of centralized Suharto regime opened the way for re-emergence of local politics in Indonesia. During the Suharto era, the locally important decision makings such as the amount and allocation of local budget and the personnel matters were done at the central level and that hampered local politics or something politically local to emerge. The democratization and decentralization in the Reformasi era totally changed the local scene, however. Money and power have been dispersed into the local area and the political stakes have suddenly increased at the local level. The power struggle for the stakes among the local politicians has become stiff and intense everywhere. The new pattern and structure of local politics have become appearing. If so, what kind of local politics is appearing in Indonesia? This panel aims to show several case studies of local politics after the decentralization and find out the keys to better implementation of decentralization in Indonesia.

142. “Who Shall Be Raja?” Local Elites’ Struggle for Power within the process of Decentralization (the case of North Sumatra Province Indonesia)
Deasy Simandjuntak (Amsterdam School for Social Science Research/ASSR)
143. The New Local Politics and the Rise of Local Strongmen in Indonesia Big Bang Decentralization
Amalinda Savirani (School on Local Politics and Autonomy Gadjah Mada University)
144. Decentralization in Indonesia: Is it Making a Difference in Local Governance?
Luce Bulosan (ICITAP U.S. Department of Justice)
145. State Formation, Local Elites, and Pemekaran Wilayah in Indonesia
Ehito Kimura (Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-Madison)
146. Controlling the Local Power and Unmobile Capital in the Decentralized Indonesia
Okamoto Masaaki (CSEAS Kyoto University)
147. Privatized Political Party at the Local Level in the “Democratization” Era: Case Study Regarding PDI-P Branch in Central Java Province
Masatoshi Sakurai (Nagoya University)
148. Lika-liku Upaya Menggagas Perda Transparansi dan Partisipatip di Kota Gorontalo
Arusdin Bone
149. The Post-Soeharto Restructuring of Local Politics in West, Central and East Java: Democratization, Power Elite and the 2004 Elections
Jun Honna (College of International Relations Ritsumeikan University)
150. Aristocrats and the Rise of Aristocrac-ism in South Sulawesi Local Politics: Some Quantitative Evidence
Dias Pradadimara (Universitas Hasanuddin)
151. De-SentraLisasi atau Re-SentraLisasi: Kajian tentang revisi UU No. 22/1999 tentang Otonomi Daerah
Hasrul Sani Siregar (Universitas Riau)
152. Cooperation Strategy of Local Politics in Poverty Alleviation
Ivanovich Agusta (IPB)
153. The Local Political Elite in Kalimantan after the Fall of Soeharto
Akiko Morishita (Asafas Kyoto University)
154. Intergovernmental Conflict in Riau: the Political Economy of Post Soeharto, 1998-2003
Wahyu Prasetyawan (Asafas Kyoto University)

REFRAMING THE COMMON INTEREST: SOCIAL EQUITY, LOCAL AGENCY, AND THE POLITICS OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE ERA OF DECENTRALISED GOVERNANCE
Panel Coordinator: Greg Acciaioli (University of Western Australia) & John McCarthy (Asia Research Centre Murdoch University)

One of the most contested political terrains in the context of regional autonomy has been the issue of decentralising resource management. While newly empowered government officials, particularly at regency level, have often sought, in the interests of accumulating regional income (pendapatan daerah), to reproduce patterns of governmentally sponsored entrepreneurial penetration marking New Order policies, local communities, in consort with networks of NGOs, international aid organizations, foundations and other interested parties, have asserted their right to gain back local control of agrarian, marine, lacustrine, riverine, forestry and other resources through various forms of community-based resource management. Such efforts have often been conceptualized as depending upon some notion of the ‘common interest’ or ‘common good’, as opposed to earlier New Order emphasis upon the ‘national interest’ in top-down (non-participatory) development programs. Some of these efforts, for example, have explicitly invoked the discourses of local adat as a basis for partnerships with government agencies and modern organizations, as in the case of co-management schemes for some national parks. This panel invites papers that address various ways in which different actors, groups and individuals, across various levels – local, district, national, and international – have conceptualised notions of common interest and articulated (and in some cases already implemented) programs for asserting the common good, however phrased, in order to achieve such goals as good governance, environmental sustainability, community empowerment, etc. The panel seeks contributions that emphasize not only the strategic partnerships involved in such efforts, but also the dynamics of contestation, and even sometimes open conflict, that characterize the contexts of conceptualisation and implementation. Papers that deal with the theorisation and critique of the ‘common interest’ concept, from such perspectives as institutionalist, (post-) structuralist, discourse, and practice theories, are as welcome as those that focus on the dynamics of specific case studies. Some papers may, for example, treat the complex ways in which rival ways of constituting the common interest may intersect with redefined village adat regimes; others may focus on informal governance arrangements that result in ‘rule of capture’ regimes and various forms of local resistance that have emerged to contest these. Throughout these various foci we hope that papers will keep to the forefront the intersection of social, environmental and governance issues in the dynamics of partnership and contestation of traditional and emergent formulations and operationalisations of the common good.

155. Peasants and Resource Rights in Java
Anu Lounela (Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology University of Helsinki)
156. Marine Resources in Jeopardy? Resource Security, the Press and the Common Good in the Era of Reformasi on Java’s Northwest coast
Anton Lucas (Flinders Asia Centre School of Politics and International Studies Flinders University)
157. Competing Conceptions, Alternative Futures: Agrarian Transformation and Regional Autonomy in Jambi, Sumatra
John McCarthy (Asia Research Centre Murdoch University) & Zulkifli Lubis (University of North Sumatra)
158. Seas of Discontent: Rethinking the Role of ‘Community’ within Indonesia’s Marine Environmental Arena
Chris Majors (Asian Studies Murdoch University)
159. Ecotourism in Selo, Boyolali, Indonesia: Government and Society Relations in the Decentralization Era
Suryo Adi Pranomo & Lucinda
160. The Common Interest and Decentralization: Bunaken National Park as a Case Study
Bryan Rochelle (Department of Anthropology RSPAS Australian National University)
161. “Kemanakah Hutan Kami ?” Dinamika Sosial dan Kontestasi Antara Pihak-Pihak yang Terlibat dalam Pengelolan Hutan di Kabupaten Seruyan Kalimantan Tengah
Oktovianus (Freelance Social Critic)
162. Towards a Political Ecology of Local Resource Conflict in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Fishermen and Forest Villagers in a Decentralised, Democratised, ‘Reformasi’ Era Jepara
Jim Schiller (Flinders Asia Centre School of Politics and International Studies Flinders University)
163. Rural Mediation Centers for Alternative Dispute Resolution and Peace Making Units in the Pacific Rim including Indonesia and Arizona
Eric P. Thor (Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management Arizona State University East Campus)
164. The Politics of Negotiation in Conflict Over Resources: A Search for Solutions of Violent Conflict in Indonesia
Thung Ju Lan (Research Center for Society and Culture The Indonesian Institute of Sciences/LIPI)
165. Regulations, Guidelines and (by) Laws; Between Rules and Education
Pam Minnigh (Consultant) & Moira Moeliono (CIFOR)
166. The Limits of Participation; Rethinking Participatory approaches in Spatial Planning
Moira Moeliono (CIFOR)
167. Abstract Challenging the Coast: An Anthropological Approach to the Governance of Integrated Coastal Development
Leontine Visser (Sociology/Anthropology of Development Wageningen University)
168. Off the Mark(et): NGO Interventions and the Missing Links in Community-based Sustainable Development Initiatives
Carol Warren (School of Asian Studies Murdoch University)
169. Food Security, Food Sovereignty: Fight for Right via Discourse and Practice
Yunita T. Winarto (Department of Anthropology FISIP University of Indonesia)
170. Environmental Conversations in the Philippines and Indonesia: practical agendas and political performances?
Padmapani L. Perez (Institute of Environmental Sciences/CML Leiden University)
171. Power Relations and Village Level Politics in the Time of “Otonomi”: Notes from case studies on Forest Management decentralisation in Indonesia
Nicolas Buyse (IEP ‘SciencesPo’ Bordeaux France / CIRAD-Tera)
172. Setelah Reformasi: Memahami Konflik-konflik Perikanan ‘Kontemporer’
Dedi Supriadi Adhuri (Kelompok Studi Maritim Puslit Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan LIPI)
173. Conserving Custom, Policing Parkland: Customary Custodianship, Multi-Ethnic Participation, and Resource Entitlement in the Lore Lindu National Park (Central Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Greg Acciaioli (Asia Research Institute National University of Singapore)
174. Pemeliharaan Lingkungan Hidup Berkelanjutan sesuai Tradisi Masyarakat Lokal
Yanuarius Koli Bau (Universitas Nusa Cendana)

CONSERVATION THROUGH PARTNERSHIP: CASE STUDIES OF NATIONAL PARKS IN INDONESIA
Panel Coordinators: Maribeth Erb (National University of Singapore) and Semiarto Aji Purwanto (Anthropology University of Indonesia)

The history of national parks in Indonesia is closely related to the idea of conserving particular endangered species, for example such animals as the Komodo Dragon, the Javan rhinoceros (badak), the dwarf water buffalo (anoa), deer pig (babirusa), and others, as well as various plants. The establishment and running of these parks has become a particularly political issue due to the articulation of park policy with forestry, fishing and other sectors related to conservation policy. The politics of national parks has involved many stakeholders at both the national and international level, including government departments, NGOs (of local and international provenience), and university-affiliated agents, from scientist to student activists. But it has often been the local people, who actually live in the vicinity of the parks, or on land that has been designated a national park, who have not been not involved in the establishment or management of these national park areas. More often than not, local people have in fact been criminalized; when continuing to pursue a mode of livelihood that has long been traditional to them they have been labelled poachers or illegal loggers, even when they are accessing resources at the behest of someone else (often international business ventures), they are the ones who are subject to legal sanctions rather than the business interests directing their activities. It is often also migrants to an area who are the ones who abuse the natural resources in the national parks and not the indigenous inhabitants.

Some of these tendencies have more recently been subject to modification, as local peoples have begun working with environmentalist NGOs (e.g. WALHI), human rights organizations (e.g. Lembaga Bantuan Hukum), and representatives of the ‘indigenous people’s movement (e.g. AMAN) to demand co-management rights and in some contexts even a moratorium on national parks. This panel calls for papers that examine the dynamics of how local people have been constrained or excluded by national park creation and management regimens (and in some cases continue in this position) and how they are now participating in some contexts in national park planning and management. It is hoped that this panel will result not only in forging a clearer understanding of the past and current dilemmas of local peoples living in and around national parks, but also present recommendations for locally empowering transformation in national park policy and management.

175. Managing National Park Collaboratively: Lesson Learnt from the Village in Buffer Zone of Kerinci Seblat National Park
Hasantoha Adnan (CIFOR) Mustafal Hadi (Dishutbun Kabupaten Bungo) and Pariyanto (Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah/PSHK-ODA)
176. Structural Impediments to Community Participation in Komodo National Park
Henning Borchers (Asian Studies University of Auckland New Zealand)
177. Who Own Forest: Local Community and State Perception’s of Tenure System in Highlands Western of Java
Herry Yogaswara (Research Center for Population Indonesian Institute of Sciences)
178. Struggling for Kebijaksanaan
Julia Arnscheidt (Van Vollenhoven Institute Faculty of Law Leiden University)
179. The Picture of Kutai National Park (Management Policy in Anthropological Perspective)
Pawennari Hijjang (Hasanuddin University)
180. Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser dan Aktivitas Kepariwisataan: Studi di TNGL Bagian Bukit Lawang
Robert Siburian (Puslit. Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan – LIPI)
181. People and Conservation: Local People Perception toward Conservation in Danau Sentarum, West Kalimantan
Yayan Indriatmoko (CIFOR) & Valentinus Herry (Yayasan Riak Bumi)
182. The National Park is Their Homelands: A Study of the Reconciliation Possibilities of the Conflicting Land Tenure Systems in Halimun Region, West Java, Indonesia
Sandra Moniaga (Elsam)
183. Partnership, How To Look Your Partners in the Face: Unexpected Consequences of Forces for Protection
Agus Mulyana (CIFOR)
184. Hemispheric Divides: Postcolonial Science and Biodiversity Conservation
Celia Lowe (Department of Anthropology University of Washington)
185. The Multiplicity of the “Local”: Implications for Conservation in Lore Lindu National Park
Erin P. Riley (Department of Anthropology University of Georgia)
186. For the People or For the Trees?: Case Study of Violence and Conservation in Ruteng Nature Recreation Park
Maribeth Erb (Department of Sociology National University of Singapore) and Yosep Jelahut (Department of Sociology Universitas Nusa Cendana)
187. Taman Nasional, Hak-hak Masyarakat Setempat dan Pembangunan Regional
Semiarto Aji Purwanto (Universitas Indonesia)

ARAB SOCIETY AND CULTURE IN SOUTHEAST ASIA
Panel Coordinators: Syed Farid Alatas (National University of Singapore) and Yasmine Z. Shahab (Anthropology University of Indonesia)

This panel will address the role of the Hadhrami Arabs in the development of Southeast Asian societies. The focus will be on their role in the spread of Islam in the region as well as the myriad of ways in which they influenced the culture of the local populations. The panelists will cover topics such as the proselytization of Islam, the role of music in the Hadhrami tariqa and its connection with Sufism, as well as other topics. Three of four panelists are expected to participate.

188. Orang Arab, Perkawinan dan Pluralisme Hukum
Kunthi Tridewiyanti (Universitas Pancasila)
189. An Old Diapora and its New Connections: Indonesian Hadrami and Hadramaut
Martin Slama (University of Vienna)
190. Land of the Sacred, Land of the Damned: Conceptualizing homeland among the upholders of the Thariqah ‘Alawiyyah in Indonesia
Ismail F. Alatas (University of Melbourne)
191. Description of Arab Saints in the 19-20th Century Southeast Asia: A Case of Taj Al-A’Ras
Kazuhiro Arai (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies)
192. Sons of the ‘Holy Land’: A Case Study of an Urban Arab Community in Lombok, Indonesia
Kendra Clegg (Lembaga Survei Indonesia)
193. Nalar Arab dalam Masyarakat Indonesia: Dulu, Kini dan Esok
Ibnu Hamad (Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi FISIP UI)
194. Mengintip Peran Keturunan Arab di Balik Keraton Jawa
Siti Hidayati Amal (Sociology Universitas Indonesia)
195. Sistim Kekerabatan sebagai Katalisator Peran Ulama Keturunan Arab di Jakarta
Yasmine Z. Shahab (Anthroplogy Universitas Indonesia)
196. Jamiat Kheir dan Pendidikan Multikultural
Musyafa-Ullah

IMAGINING COOPERATION AND PARTNERSHIP
Panel Coordinators: Ninuk Kleden (Indonesian Institute of Social Sciences) & Tommy Christommy (Faculty of Humanities University of Indonesia)

Multikulturalisme menyarankan tiga hal penting. Pertama, pendukung sebuah kebudayaan, walaupun banyak dipengaruhi kebudayaannya, ternyata tidak dapat menutup diri dari kebudayaan lain di luar yang difahaminya. Kedua, kendati setiap kebudayaan dapat menyediakan sistem makna bagi para pendukungnya, sistem makna tersebut tentulah tidaklah sempurna dan tidak serta merta dapat mendukung segala aspek pemaknaan yang dihadapinya dari kurun ke kurun dan senantiasa ada kebutuhan untuk menengok sistem pemaknaan lain. Ketiga, meskipun sebuah kebudayaan memiliki self determination, ia tidak luput dari asimilasi dan pengaruh. Dengan kata lain, multikulturalisme terbentuk karena ada keinginan untuk saling “membaca”, membuka diri, membangun kerjasama dan kemitraan tanpa harus mendominasi satu sama lain.

Mengkaji berbagai ekspresi imajinatif yang tercermin dalam bentuk karya sastra, program tv, teater, seni pertunjukan rakyat, dan berbagai media seni lainnya, membantu kita memahami lebih mendalam proses kemitraan tersebut.

Kesenian, selain sebagai ladang ekspresif kalangan seniman, juga digunakan oleh berbagai agen lainnya untuk merekonstruksikan kekuasaan dan melakukan perubahan. Untuk itu, kita perlu membahas bentuk ekspresi yang terkait dengan masalah ideologi di balik produksi dan penciptaan, identitas, representasi, regulasi. Ketoprak humor diproduksi tidak hanya dalam konteks ke-Jawa-an tetapi juga dalam konteks cultural industry yang lebih heterogen yang membayangkan pemirsa dari berbagai etnis dan status sosial. Dengan sendirinya, di dalamnya terjadi diversitas meaning dan interpretasi tentang perilaku manusia yang diasumsikan dapat “dibagi” dan dinikmati bersama.

Sungguhpun demikian, menyiasati kerjasama dan kemitraan di Indonesia bukanlah hal mudah. Sejumlah pranata budaya yang menopang dasar-dasar kemitraan sering luluh lantak dihadapan faktor-faktor eksternal seperti politik dan globalisasi ekonomi. Panel ini ingin membahas lebih tajam konsep kerjasama dan kemitraan dalam berbagai ekspresi: pertunjukan, sastra, lukisan, tarian, dan nyanyian, baik yang populer, tradisional, maupun klasik. Bagaimana ekspresi tersebut dapat memediasi konsep-konsep kerjasama dan kemitraan, baik untuk masyarakat pendukungnya maupun untuk pendukung budaya lainnya. Selain itu, diharapkan muncul pula kajian-kajian yang dapat menjelaskan lebih lanjut transformasi nilai-nilai tersebut pada masyarakat Indonesia kontemporer.

197. Imagining Cooperation: Expectations of Interculturalism and I La Galigo
Jennifer Lindsay
198. ‘Dari Zakar ke Zikir’: Cultural Autonomy and the Poetry of Binhad Nurrohmat
Marshall Clark (School Of Asian Languages and Studies University of Tasmania)
199. Elephants Fight, Deer Killed in the Middle: The fight between Hollywood and Indonesian Distributors, 1991-1992
Tito Imanda (New York University)
200. Film Anak Jalanan dan Angan-Angan (tentang) Anak-Anak
Widya Utama & Kurniawan Adi Saputro (Etnoreflika)
201. Urban Basic Services Delivery for the Poor: Does Partnership Work in Bangladesh Cities?
Mallik Akram Hossain
202. Negotiating the Path of Blessings
T. Christomy (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
203. Nasionalisme dan Sistem Budaya dalam Konteks Kerjasama dan Kemitraan yang Tersirat dalam Beberapa Karya Novel Pramoedya Ananta Toer
Koh Young Hun
204. Cokek: Multicultural Challenge to Indonesia’s Cultural Politics
Ninuk Kleden (LIPI)
205. Local Theatre – Community-Based, Globally – Wired
Barbara Hatley (University of Tasmania)
206. Makna Sosial dan Budaya di Balik Alih Kode dalam Pertunjukan Ketoprak Humor
Katubi (Pusat Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan/PMB-LIPI)
207. Catatan Awal Hubungan LEKRA-Seni Rupa
Antariksa (KUNCI Yogyakarta)
208. Pelaku Budaya Pinggiran dan Ekspresi: Membaca Seniman Sumatra
Wannofri Samry (Universitas Andalas)

CONSUMING PASSIONS: POPULAR CULTURE, LIFE-STYLES AND IDENTITY POLITICS IN GLOBALISED INDONESIA
Panel Coordinator: Amrih Widodo (Faculty of Asian Studies Australian National University)

The collapse of Suharto’s dictatorship and the establishment of a new political system in Indonesia intersected with an immense boost in mass communication, popular culture production and consumption-based identity formation.

This panel is an attempt to sketch the development of consumer cultures in Indonesia by looking at the production, distribution and consumption of popular culture as important sites for identity formation and construction of social imaginary.

It will raise questions on how the three most salient factors which usually dominate the political and cultural discourse of the developing modernity in Southeast Asia, i.e. state, family and religion, have to grapple with this new globalised, mediated and commodified realities.

Each paper may focus on certain elements of the development of consumer culture: relationships between monetary and cultural factors of national, local or religious rituals; utilisation of communication and media technologies in traditions; impacts of consumer goods on class or group formation, etc. In one way or another, however, the panel will discuss creativity and negotiation on interpretations and representations of national, communal and religious identities, hence, treating them as cultural and political practices in the imagination of self-hood, community and nation. The panel will draw implications on state-society relations, cultural policies, and relationship between belief and everyday practices.

209. Fashioning Islam: Commodity, Life-Styles and Religious Expressions in Everyday Indonesia
Amrih Widodo (Faculty of Asian Studies Australian National University)
210. Islam as a Symbolic Commodity: Transmitting and Consuming Islam through Public Sermons in Indonesia
Akhmad Muzakki (IAIN Sunan Ampel / Australian National University)
211. Nike Ardilla, Instant Pop Saint
George Quinn (Faculty of Asian Studies Australian National University)
212. Politik Penciptaan Budaya Handphone
Nuraini Juliastuti (Kunci Jogjakarta)
213. Consuming the ‘World’: The Experience of Manufacturing Workers with American Chain Restaurants
Nico Warouw (Sanata Dharma University)
214. Indonesian Techno-Politics: From Interkom to Internet
Joshua Barker (Department of Anthropology University of Toronto)